Monday, May 19, 2014

Innovation and Failure: The Under Appreciated Skills of a Policy Debater

I am going to expand on a theme I've been writing about. Some of the below has already been presented by the CEDA president in a recent social media campaign and by me in a Keynote Address to the Michigan Jaycees. Enjoy!

In order to stay a step ahead of opponents policy debaters are encouraged to take the basic building block of an argument and innovate new ways to refute their opponents. One of the primary ways debate maintains flexibility in training is by having a limited number of formal rules and encouraging debaters to create the world of debate that best serves their needs and the training they desire. Unlike other competitive forums were students are beholden to one interpretation of the game they play, debates strongest feature is its ability to innovate via in round debates. From speed talking, to interpreting topics creatively or using different forms of academic research debate forces students to stay ahead of the argumentative curve.

In fact, the format for debate is itself debatable. This feature teaches skills in advocacy that no other activity can match. To an outsider this contestation may be confusing or frustrating, but in the academic world of debate this contestation is what makes the activity innovative. This skill is essential to advocacy that includes the creation or amending of rules, standards or norms. In an ever more quickly changing world the ability to innovate is necessary to be successful in any field, and debate trains innovation better than any other activity.     


Debate also encourages innovation as a response to failure. In policy debate students must deal with the consequences of failure. In every debate a student either wins or losses and no team has ever been undefeated through their entire careers. Often time students only have a matter of minutes in between losing one debate and having to start another. Learning to take a loss, and learning from that loss is a unique aspect of policy debate, this process leads to the creativity necessary for innovation. Students must learn to dwell in this failure and according to Judith Halberstam that is in and of itself productive,  

"Under certain circumstances failing, losing, forgetting, unmaking, undoing, unbecoming, not knowing may in fact offer more creative, more cooperative, more surprising ways of being in the world... Perhaps most obviously, failure allows us to escape the punishing norms that discipline behavior and manage human development with the goal of delivering us from unruly childhoods to orderly and predictable adulthoods. Failure preserves some of the wondrous anarchy of childhood and disturbs the supposedly clean boundaries between adults and children, winners and losers." (Halberstam, 2-3) 

----
Halberstam, Judith The Queer Art of Failure Durham & London: Duke University Press 2011